Only if after this communication and invitation the Webmaster did not retire the content him person in charge could do. Nevertheless this same article leaves a door open so that the lender of services of intermediation can contribute his own procedures of control, that in any case describes as volunteers. In addition one articulates what I consider drawer of tailor in which they are possible to be included any other type of knowledge when he indicates other means of effective knowledge that could settle down . The Courts are dictating Sentences where such principle is interpreted. The Supreme Court, resorting for its interpretation to the Directive of Electronic Commerce, in Sentences STS 773/2009, Room of the Civilian, of 9 of December of 2009, STS 316/2010, Room of the Civilian, 18 of May of 2010, and STS 72/2011, Room of the Civilian, 10 of February of 2011 (Ramoncn case), indicates that article 16 allows to that favorable interpretation to the Directive when leaving out of danger the possibility of other means of effective knowledge that could settle down , is not possible to do without which the same attributes to equal value that to effective knowledge to which it obtains by the lender of the service from facts or apt circumstances to make possible, although mediately or by inferences logics within reach of anyone, an effective apprehension of in question reality. In Sentencia dictated in the assumption of Ramoncn Web condemns to the lenders of services of intermediation by the expressions spilled by third parties in its page, with foundation in 16 Art. dela LSSICE, in relation to article 10 of the same Law, and it because the Webmaster failed to fulfill with the legal obligation to publish, of permanent, easy, direct and gratuitous form the information that the mentioned article indicates, information that would allow that the affected third party could communicate to the person in charge of the Web on any information that could be to him detrimental. .

Sorry, comments are closed.